best microsoft windows 10 home license key key windows 10 professional key windows 11 key windows 10 activate windows 10 windows 10 pro product key AI trading Best automated trading strategies Algorithmic Trading Protocol change crypto crypto swap exchange crypto mcafee anti-virus norton antivirus Nest Camera Best Wireless Home Security Systems norton antivirus Cloud file storage Online data storage
tes

Torre de Babel Ediciones

De facto and de jure. Vocabulary of Philosophy. William Fleming

Diccionario filosófico

Voltaire.

Complete edition

Diccionario de Filosofía

Brief definition of the most important concepts of philosophy.

 

A Dictionary of English Philosophical Terms Francis Garden

 

Vocabulary of Philosophy, Psychological, Ethical, Metaphysical

William Fleming

Biografías y semblanzas Biographical references and lives of philosophers

Brief introduction to the thought of Ortega y Gasset

History of Philosophy Summaries

Historia de la Filosofía

Explanation of the thought of the great philosophers; summaries, exercises…

Historia de la Filosofía

Digital edition of the History of Philosophy by Jaime Balmes

Historia de la Filosofía

Digital edition of the History of Philosophy by Zeferino González

Vidas, opiniones y sentencias de los filósofos más ilustres

Complete digital edition of the work of Diogenes Laertius

Compendio de las vidas de los filósofos antiguos

Fénelon

A brief history of Greek Philosophy

B. C. Burt

 

A Short History of Philosophy

Alexander

 

 

DE FACTO and DE JURE

DE FACTO and DE JURE—With some offences the penalty attaches to the offender at the instant when the fact is committed; in others, not until he is convicted by law. In the former case he is guilty de facto, in the latter de jure

De facto is commonly used in the sense of actually or really, and de jure in the sense of rightfully or legally; hence the philosophical use of the terms. A de facto proof is a mere "natural history" of the facts; a de jure proof is a vindication of their existence; e.g., the principle of causality may be proved de facto, i.e., it may be shown to be as a matter of fact accepted and acted upon by men; or de jure, i.e., it may be shown to be the necessary presupposition of the facts of experience, or of experience itself. This last is the Kantian method of proof, called by him Transcendental Deduction

© TORRE DE BABEL EDICIONES – Edition: Isabel Blanco  – Legal notice and privacy policy

 
tes